The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart gives information about how many enquiries that were sent to the Tourist Information Office in an urban area by all 3 types of communication over a period of 6 months from January to June in 2011.

Overall, letter or email was not well-liked by citizens and had a tendency to decrease, while face-to-face interaction and telephone dramatically increased throughout the research.

At the beginning of the period, just 400 customers chose to go directly to the Office in order to exchange information, which was the lowest number at that time. However, the number of people who used in-person communication was rise gradually 2 months after, then continuously boomed and reached a peak at around 1900 in June. The same went with telephone service. Apart from a slight decline in February, the figure for users of telephone service had a considerable increase over the period.

In contrast, letter/email began with a high number in January, at under 800 customers. Nevertheless, it went down slightly to approximately 700 in March and significantly decreased in the next 2 months before fluctuating under 400 in the final 2 months of the period.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-26 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-07-12 Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn 67 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
Essays by user ththienan :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, apart from, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10994764398 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09075289988 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643979057592 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5138708654 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170475193016 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634165813341 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073697347317 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10050554052 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903220960867 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.