The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three diferent areas of European country between 1987 and 2007

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three diferent areas of European country between 1987 and 2007

The line graph compares the number of foreign tourists who visited three different kinds of areas of a European nation from 1987 to 2007.
In the year 1987, the coast area attracted up to about 40.000 people, which was the highest . The figures for Series 3 and the lake - the mountain were lower , at around 10.000 and 20.000 people respectively. During the period between 1987 and 2007 ,there was a slight increase in the number of international tourists that the coast welcomed to 62.000 people.The figure for the lake- the mountain area witnessed more significant changes than that for the coast ,reached the highest point of the whole line graph ,at approximately 75.000 people .Besides Series 3 welcomed a fluctuating number of tourists during the same period, at around 25.000 people.
Over the following 5 years, the number of foreign tourists who paid a visit to the lake –the moutain and the coast areas dropped slowly to about 9.000 and 7.000 people respectively whereas the figure for Series 3 skyrocketed before reaching the highest point of its own during the 20 - year period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-23 thaolp3 11 view
2019-08-25 Bui Thanh Phuong 78 view
2019-08-25 Bui Thanh Phuong 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...out 40.000 people, which was the highest . The figures for Series 3 and the lake -...
^^
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...or Series 3 and the lake - the mountain were lower , at around 10.000 and 20.000 peo...
^^^^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...3 and the lake - the mountain were lower , at around 10.000 and 20.000 people resp...
^^
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... During the period between 1987 and 2007 ,there was a slight increase in the numbe...
^^
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...hat the coast welcomed to 62.000 people.The figure for the lake- the mountain area ...
^^^
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nificant changes than that for the coast ,reached the highest point of the whole l...
^^
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he highest point of the whole line graph ,at approximately 75.000 people .Besides ...
^^
Line 2, column 544, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ne graph ,at approximately 75.000 people .Besides Series 3 welcomed a fluctuating ...
^^
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
... graph ,at approximately 75.000 people .Besides Series 3 welcomed a fluctuating number ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9781420765 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53023129481 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568306010929 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 134.424104981 43.030603864 312% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 182.2 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6 22.9334400587 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161871873617 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109566673662 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101903391133 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15062515498 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106220199664 0.0819641961636 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.