The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004/5.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004/5.

The line graph illustrates the quantity of commuter trips using national rail network, London underground, and Light rail & metro systems in Great Britain from 1950 to 2004/5.
Overall, the number of passenger journeys on all three main ways of transport rose considerably during the period given. In addition, National rail network almost received more passenger trips than both railways remaining.
According the line graph, the number of commuter journeys using National rail network remained constant from 1950 to 1955. The figure for National rail systems soared to a peak of over 1,100 millions and then decreased significantly from 1,100 in 1955 to under 750 in 1975. While the figure for London underground also remained unchanged at around (this low level from 1950 to 1975. That for National rail network and London underground increase slightly before fall back to its trough of 600 and 500 millions respectively .
As can be seen from the line graph, The quantity of trips made on national rail network and London underground hiked to under 750 and then plunged back to 750 in 1985. After that, the figures for both railway journeys increased to a new peak of over and under 1,000 respectively. Light rail and metro systems increased dramatically by 200 millions from 1962 to 2004/05

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-09 Masha323 67 view
2019-03-02 hongnguyen69 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ugh of 600 and 500 millions respectively . As can be seen from the line graph, T...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15165876777 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59566251795 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530805687204 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4619737091 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.7 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175188603086 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772317055243 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591683934071 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125288690357 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385803845037 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.