The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004/5.

The line chart illustrates the quantity of people travelling by railway over the time span between 1950 and 2004/5 in the UK .

Regarding the time period from 1950 to 1980, the National rail network was chosen for journeys by a very large majority British. It reached a pick of more than 1000 million passengers per year in 1960, however, than popularity of national rail decreased gradually by less than 750 million in 1980. Comparing with other ways of railway travels in the same time period, there were a slight fluctuation in number of people who used London Underground, and in the middle on 1970’s it started to decline gradually by 500 million until the year 1981. In contrast, people started to use Light rail and metro systems, in 1965, but this source of travelling was the least popular. It levelled off at several millions of users until the 9180.

Taking into account the next time span from 1980 to 2004/2005, the using of both National rail Network and London Underground increased significantly, and by the end of the period the number of users of National rail reached a pick second time, while the quantity of passengers of Underground were almost 1000 million. As for Light rail and metro systems, there was a small rise in number of passengers, but it still the least popular compared to other railway sources among British.

Overall, the whole trend have changed insignificantly, as National rail network remains the most popular source of rail travelling.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e span between 1950 and 2004/5 in the UK . Regarding the time period from 1950...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an between 1950 and 2004/5 in the UK . Regarding the time period from 1950 to 1...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, while, as for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89122807018 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59454695862 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.1117934943 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.4 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100107600835 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467085019742 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524619527547 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838976453893 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630466772961 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.