The line graph illustrates the quantity by millions of railway travels made in the UK from 1950 to May 2004.
Overall, it is clear that people chose going by national rail network and London underground over travelling by light rail and metro systems, which appeared a bit later than two former systems.
To begin with, in 1950, there were only two types of travelling systems, one was the national network and the other was the underground of London. At that time, people preferred to make journeys by the national system, with a total of 1000 millions travels, while the number of journeys made by London underground only made up roughly 700 million. Travels of national network reached a peak of about 1100 million in the late of 1950s, before dropped gradually until early 1980s. The number of underground journeys remained steadily between 1950 and mid-1970s, then fell to only 500 million in early 1980s.
From 1980s to May 2004, the quantities of travels in both systems were similar, a little fluctuate but clearly upward. In May 2004, there were approximately 1000 million of journeys made by each system. In addition, light rail and metro systems didn’t appear until early of 1960s, and only after 1980 that they began to be more popular, but still not many people chose to take them. The number of travels made by them in May 2004 was about 100 million.
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 67
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 83
- as countries develop their population tend to live individually small family In your opinion what is cause and what are effect on society Is it a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers people lose the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to go'.
Suggestion: to go
... Overall, it is clear that people chose going by national rail network and London und...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, still, then, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86382978723 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38344980146 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536170212766 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4363052115 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185460880338 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926789450179 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830528310273 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1259152206 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855433109803 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.