The graph below shows the number of people taking part in a wildlife survey in Britain between 2001 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of people taking part in a wildlife survey in
Britain between 2001 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting
the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table provides data on the number of people who participated in a wildlife survey in Britain over a nine-year period, from 2001 to 2009.
Examining the data for adults, it is clear that participation increased significantly from 36,000 in 2001 to a peak of 332,000 in 2005. After this high point, the number of adult participants declined to 270,000 by 2009. This demonstrates a substantial rise in interest initially, followed by a decrease in the later years.
Turning to the data for children, the number of young participants also saw notable changes. In 2001, 12,000 children took part in the survey, and this number tripled to 36,000 by 2003. Although there was a slight decline to 31,000 in 2007, participation surged dramatically to 270,000 in 2009, equaling the number of adult participants that year.
Overall, the total number of participants in the wildlife survey showed a consistent upward trend over the period. Starting from a combined total of 48,000 in 2001, participation rose every year, reaching 540,000 by 2009. This indicates growing public engagement with wildlife conservation efforts in Britain.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-24 Zahid6400 78 view
2024-06-24 Zahid6400 73 view
Essays by user Zahid6400 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24861878453 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96893349537 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580110497238 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6132078364 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161468746677 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779177720535 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615116827318 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127684487744 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062179960606 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.