The graph illustrates the changing in the amount of closing and opening in a range of years from 2011 to 2018.
In 2011, there are less than 6500 shops were closed then reach a peak after two years at more than 7000. The figure became the lowest at about 600 stores were closed then increased significantly to tiny higher point at 5000. In addition, the number of places fluctuated slightly in the last two years of the terms.
The figure for the openings was numerous higher than the closures at 8500 in the first year of the time while it was decline sharply to 4000 locations in the next year. The highest number was recorded in 2014 with more than 6000 stores were announced. In the next three years, the number of shops almost were not changed while it reached the lowest at 3000 in 2018.
Overall, there several fluctuations in the trend of announcements and closures of shops throughout eight years.
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62962962963 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32200529306 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561728395062 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1971072651 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.75 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215019440118 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101081608445 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646187182566 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138196811313 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480755580481 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.