The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph displays the visitor numbers on a specific Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the number of visitors saw a dramatic growth in total. In addition, while in the beginning, tourists preferred staying on island, the reverse can be seen at the end of the recorded period.
The total number of arrivals on the island increased almost every year of the specified period. In 2010, there were only 1 million visitors, which strikingly increased to approximately 2.7 in 2015. Before the tourist numbers jumped to 3.5 in 2017, it witnessed a plateau from 2015 to 2016.
The number of tourists who stayed on the island stood at about 0.75 million in 2010 and 2011. It consistently rose to 1.5 million before remaining at this level from 2013 to 2017, except for a marginal dip in 2016.
In comparison, there were fewer visitors staying on cruise ships in 2010. The figures registered some fluctuations in the first 2 years, after which progressively grew, outnumbering the number of those staying on the island in 2016 and reaching 2 million in 2017.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | RIYA MODI | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | dhphuc7866 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | rumpul4skin | view | |
| 2023-08-15 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | NgoMinhTriet | 84 | view |
- Younger individuals are happier with life than elderly folks are Do you agree or disagree 73
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows local catches and imports of fresh fish into Perth Australia for the years 2004 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 78
- Some people believe world poverty can be solved by the governments of rich countries giving large amounts of money to the governments of poor countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88524590164 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65888410165 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579234972678 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6750649591 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205980962515 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891381804135 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582348544359 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128716545816 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538057782369 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88524590164 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65888410165 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579234972678 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6750649591 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205980962515 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891381804135 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582348544359 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128716545816 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538057782369 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.