The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the number of people who traveled to Caribbean Island in two distinct groups from 2010 to 2017.
It is obvious that, totally there was an upward trend in tourists visiting throughout the period. The people who stay on cruise ships increased annually except in 2012. the visitors staying on island has more number rather thon visitors staying on cruise ships except two last years.
As can be seen, visitors who staying on cruise ships after that increased about 0.25 million in 2011 decreased and recovered again in 2013 and then has a slight raise around 1.5 million from 0.5 until 2017. Whereas visitors who staying on island did not change until 2011 and then increase slightly around 0.75 million and then has a stable situation for three consecutive years between 2013 and 2015. The number of tourists decreased approximately 0.25 million in 2016 and in last year raised. Totally people who visit Caribbean Island have upward trend during the period. It was quite obviously that people did not like stay on island in 2016 and 2017.
As a result, there were a thoroughly surge trend by considering two groups and the number of people that stay on cruise ships was more than visitors staying on island.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans below show a harbor in 2000 and how it looks today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below give information on the location and types of the dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hips increased annually except in 2012. the visitors staying on island has more num...
^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
... who visit Caribbean Island have upward trend during the period. It was quite obvious...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('thoroughly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('surge') instead of another adjective.
...2016 and 2017. As a result, there were a thoroughly surge trend by considering two groups and the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89523809524 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28422570575 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1783848812 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13503481397 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691814084426 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523100452004 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104102622013 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587004690768 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.