The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the number of tourists visiting a Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017, categorized into two groups: visitors staying on cruise ships and visitors staying on the island.
Overall, there was a steady upward trend in the total number of tourists visiting the Caribbean Island throughout the given period. While the number of visitors staying on cruise ships generally increased, with a minor decline in 2012, visitors staying on the island consistently outnumbered them, except in the final two years.
In terms of specifics, the number of tourists staying on cruise ships experienced an initial surge of approximately 0.25 million in 2011. Despite a temporary setback, this was followed by a recovery in 2013 and a gradual rise to around 1.5 million visitors by 2017. On the other hand, the number of tourists staying on the island remained relatively stable until 2011, after which it experienced a modest increase to approximately 0.75 million visitors. This figure remained steady for three consecutive years, from 2013 to 2015. However, there was a decline of approximately 0.25 million visitors in 2016, followed by an increase in the final year.
In summary, the total number of tourists visiting the Caribbean Island demonstrated a consistent upward trend during the period under review. Notably, visitors staying on cruise ships were outnumbered by those staying on the island, except in the last two years.
- The charts below what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 67
- It is important for everyone including young people to save money for their future To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31739130435 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74481466796 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473913043478 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3348362793 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176220188961 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826124294398 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810308394395 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144336001913 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070299565967 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.