The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart compares the number of visitors travel to Caribbean island over past 7 years.

Overall, it is clear that the number of total visitors was in incline trend from 2010 to 2017. While visitors staying on cruise ships showed some fluctuation, the trend was in rising. However, the number of visitors staying on island kept a stablely trend between 2013 to 2015.

According to the line graph, there were 1 millions of visitors go to the Caribbean island in 2010. However, the number of visitors was an increase trend between 2011 and 2015, remained stable in 2016 and showed sharp increasing trend in 2017. The number of visitors staying on crusie ships in a fluctuation. There were a steadily increasing tendency of visitors staying on cruise ships, from 0.25 millions in 2010 to 0.5 millions in 2011 but decreased in 0.25 millions in 2012. However, the number of visitors staying on cruise ships in the increasing trend after 2013, which rise from 0.5 millions to 2 millions.

The number of visitors staying on island in variation, which kept stability in 2010 and 2011 (0.75 millions). And then increased from 0.75 millions to 1.5 millions of visitors between 2012 to 2013 and kept stability again in three years. Declined from 1.5 millions to 0.75 millions from 2015 to 2016.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-22 hahoaan 73 view
2024-08-14 Zahid6400 61 view
2024-04-14 soomi2209 61 view
2024-03-11 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-01-14 Ahmad_off 67 view
Essays by user MinyiChu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...According to the line graph, there were 1 millions of visitors go to the Caribbean island in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
... then increased from 0.75 millions to 1.5 millions of visitors between 2012 to 2013 and kept ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89090909091 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44773465855 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.409090909091 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.57504429 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128057722896 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706332716454 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476954135847 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985192505863 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243180590002 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.