the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Summarise the information by reporting the main feature and make comparisons where posssible.
The line graph indicates the number of visitors who toured carribean island , between the year 2010 and 2017. Strikingly, more visitors preferred to stay at island compared to staying on cruise ship, whereas the number of visiting tourist saw a rapid growth between the 7 year time period.
In year 2010, almost 250000 tourist stayed on ship, which fluctuated initially till year 2013, since then it kept increasing and reached 2 million by year 2017. The visitor who opted to stay on island remained constant in first 2 years. However, it surged in next two years which means a total of 1.5 million tourist were on island in 2013. That figure remained steady for next next " style="color: rgb(85, 85, 85); font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">two year followed by a little downward trend in year 2016. Although it again 5 million in year
In term of total number of visitors, 1 million tourist tourist " style="color: rgb(85, 85, 85); font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">were recorded in 2010, which increased increased " style="color: rgb(85, 85, 85); font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">throughtout till the year 2015, where figure reached a little more than 2.5 million. After remained steady for 1 year it surged to 3.5 million by the end of year 2017.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-20 | vicky sharma | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | Farwa Nasir | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Number of tourist visiting a Carribean Island 2010 2017
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparasions where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of visitors who toured carribean island , between the year 2010 and 2017. Strikin...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: next
...n 2013. That figure remained steady for next next ' style='color: rgb85, 85, 85...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y a little downward trend in year 2016. Although it again 5 million in year In term o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: tourist
... of total number of visitors, 1 million tourist tourist ' style='color: rgb85, 85, 85...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: increased
...rap;'>were recorded in 2010, which increased increased ' style='color: rgb85, 85, 85...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36714975845 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5485035964 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526570048309 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 101.352109006 43.030603864 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.875 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118416654656 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760356297929 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659887108263 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111509988816 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746368182831 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.