The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line graph indicates the number of visitors who toured carribean island , between the year 2010 and 2017. Strikingly, more visitors preferred to stay at island compared to staying on cruise ship, whereas the number of visiting tourist saw a rapid growth between the 7 year time period.
In year 2010, almost 250000 tourist stayed on ship, which fluctuated initially till year 2013, since then it kept increasing and reached 2 million by year 2017. The visitor who opted to stay on island remained constant in first 2 years. However, it surged in next two years which means a total of 1.5 million tourist were on island in 2013. That figure remained steady for next next " style="color: rgb(85, 85, 85); font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">two year followed by a little downward trend in year 2016. Although it again reached the figure of 1.5 million in year 2017.
In term of total number of visitors, 1 million tourist tourist " style="color: rgb(85, 85, 85); font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">were recorded in 2010, which increased increased " style="color: rgb(85, 85, 85); font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">throughtout till the year 2015, where figure reached a little more than 2.5 million. After remained steady for 1 year it surged to 3.5 million by the end of year 2017.
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the cours 84
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparasions where relevant 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparasions where relevant 90
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of visitors who toured carribean island , between the year 2010 and 2017. Strikin...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: next
...n 2013. That figure remained steady for next next ' style='color: rgb85, 85, 85...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y a little downward trend in year 2016. Although it again reached the figure of 1.5 mill...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: tourist
... of total number of visitors, 1 million tourist tourist ' style='color: rgb85, 85, 85...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: increased
...;'>were recorded in 2010, which increased increased ' style='color: rgb85, 85, 85...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38679245283 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.66555139844 2.65546596893 138% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.1215441181 43.030603864 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 126.888888889 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167259477797 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984782076907 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901446180791 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157621205657 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112304000946 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.