The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrated the amount of people staying a particular Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest number of tourists went to that particular island to spend their leisure in 2017.
According to the graph, between 2010 and 2011 value which visitors staying on island did not change, However after it started grow up to 2013. The value of visitors staying on island stayed the same from 2013 to 2015. Approximately 0.5 million tourists stayed on a cruise ship in 2010. The amount of visitors that stayed on cruise ship was monthly increasing drop to 0.5 million in 2017. After it sharply rised. Even though the number of visitors who stent their time in cruise ships fell, it rocked sharply and the quantity of them reached 2 millions in 2017.
Interm of total number of visitors, 1 million tourists were recorded in 2010, which increased throughout till the year 2015 where figure reached a little more than than 2.5 million. After remained steady for 1 year it surged to 3.5 million by the end of year 2017.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...increasing drop to 0.5 million in 2017. After it sharply rised. Even though the numbe...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s were recorded in 2010, which increased throughout till the year 2015 where figu...
^^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: than
...2015 where figure reached a little more than than 2.5 million. After remained steady for ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72972972973 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32151936345 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7132702963 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1974140044 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846904374682 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675243735483 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148114015343 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570255539767 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.