The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The graph allows us to see the number of tourists coming to a specific Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.

Overall, the quantity of tourists who stayed on cruise ships completely outranked those who stayed on island itself during their visit in 2017.

From 2010 and 2017, the total number of visitors grew rapidly as it began at 1 million in 2010. The line reached its peak in 2017 with numbers 3.5 million. Similarly, in 2010, the figure of visitors who stayed on cruise started at approximately. 0.30 million, then went up to 0.5 million in 2011. Till 2017, it produced a rigid increase with 2 million visitors.

In contrast, the number of tourists stayed on island was 0.70 million in 2010 and it did not change until 2012. However, it reached its highest point during 2013 and 2014 showing 1.5 million. It is clear that most people changed their minds and chose to stay on cruise ships after 2015 as the number of visitors staying on island decreased to 1.25 million in 2016. But it rose again in 2017 to 1.5 million.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir visit in 2017. From 2010 and 2017, the total number of visitors grew rapidl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, then, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65027322404 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29367638458 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1261498946 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3636363636 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190833623394 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085353899094 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703867705834 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146600956497 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693514566018 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.