The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant
The given line chart illustrates how many visitors of a Caribbean island within the 7-year period from 2010.
Overall, due to the number’s rises of tourists staying on both cruise ships and island, total figures of people vising Caribbean island increased dramatically during the given time. Even though, people preferred accommodations on island, the number of ships’ tourists reached the highest point at the end of period.
In 2010, there was only about 0.25 million visitors staying on ships which was a third of those being on islands. From 2010 to 2012, the data of visitors on island reached bottom, at roughly 0.7 million visitors in 2011 whilst those on ships witnessed a fluctuation under 0.5 million visitors.
In 2017, total value of people visiting a Caribbean island peaked at 3.5 million visitors which was mainly caused sharp surge of that staying on cruises to 2 million visitors. Obviously, the number of visitors staying on cruise rocketed significantly from 2012 to 2017, by approximately 1.75 million visitors. On the contrary, that of those grew slightly from about 1.3 to 1.5 million visitors in the similar period.
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 80
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2010 to 2014 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...million visitors in the similar period.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17204301075 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61807532709 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543010752688 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7408522979 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131139991041 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682201672696 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398062909175 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909759225102 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342336105957 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.