The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The given line graph illustrate the number of vacationers visiting a particular Caribbean island over the course of7 years from 2010 to 2017.
In general, it is indicated that the total visitors count significant increased thoughout the time period. Furthermore, the number of tourists staying aboard cruise ships was lower than the number of visitors staying on the island for the most of the time.
In 2010, a total volume of tourists visiting the Caribben island was exactly 1 million with 0.75 million staying on the island and the rest on cruise ships. While the number of people staying aboard cruise ships witnessed an insignificant drop to reach the lowest point of just below 0.25 million, staying on the island remained the more popular option, with 1.25 million visitors.
Over the next five years, the number of arrivals to the island progressively increased to roughly 2.75 million in 2015, maintained at that level in 2016, and then soared to 3.5 million in 2017. Similarly, the number of cruise ship passengers began to rise significantly, surpassing the number of island visitors in 2016 and reaching precisely 2 million in 2017. Aside from that, the volume of tourist s who stayed on the island consistently grew until reaching a plateau of 1.5 million that lasted from 2013 to 2017, with the exception of a tiny fall in 2016.
- Some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerable To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 518, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
... million that lasted from 2013 to 2017, with the exception of a tiny fall in 2016.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, similarly, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98672566372 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59680234337 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.7596659219 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.875 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180594206138 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928950388614 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596485025002 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129970563277 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561053989915 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.