The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
This line graph showcase the number of students graduates in Canada Universities between 1992 and 2007.
In the beginning, both men and women who got the degree were increased steadily. Although the count raised, It started to decrease after 1994. Even though all the two went to fall, Men's total managed to improve after 1998. Next of 2000, their total increased at a steady state.
From this graph, it understood clearly that the women's count was high when compared to the men. In spite of their fall, the total of women managed to be untouchable by the men in total. Even at the time of fall also, the count doesn't decrease below 100,000. The fall count is just about a few thousand. We can see the drastic change in the number after 2000 both in men and women. In 2006, Women's graduates touched nearly 140,000 whereas men's count reached above 90,000
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | d.baquan123@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | Ljoshi | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- In many countries people are concerned about the number of children who are overweight.What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 61
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. 61
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
This line graph showcase the number of s...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ada Universities between 1992 and 2007. In the beginning, both men and wome...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r total increased at a steady state. From this graph, it understood clearly t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ven at the time of fall also, the count doesnt decrease below 100,000. The fall count ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all count is just about a few thousand. We can see the drastic change in the num...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 713.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72185430464 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19977232675 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629139072848 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.0153066724 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.8181818182 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.7272727273 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168438024997 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653253568194 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133101657913 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187092161545 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20594161448 0.0819641961636 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.5 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.