The graph shows the quantity of university graduates in Canada from the year 1992 to the year 2007, divided by gender. At a glance, the number of graduates have increasead in both groups and the variations over tthe years are almost similiar.
On the One hand, the number of women that finished their studies in that period, increasesed from 100,000 in 1992 to 150,000 in 2007. However, in the period from 1992 to 2000 the female gradutes remained almost stable nearly 100,000 with a little peak of 105,000 in 1995. Althought thid trend in that period, in 2000 the number of graduates started a dramatically increaase and hited the hight point in 2006 with 150,000
On the other hand, the number of graduted men, had a similiar trend, started in 70,000 in 1992 and climbed to almost 80,000 in 1994, after that the number of graduates plumped to almost 70,000 again. Finally, after suffered some fluctuations until 2001, the number growed up to almost 100,000 graduates in 2007.
To conclude, both lines have similiar trend and made a big increase in 2001. However, in the complete period, the number of women increased almost a 50% and the number of men just almost a 40%.
The graph shows the quantity of university graduates in Canada from the year 1992 to the year 2007, divided by gender. At a glance, the number of graduates have increasead in both groups and the variations over tthe years are almost similiar.
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 56
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 67
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r suffered some fluctuations until 2001, the number growed up to almost 100,000 g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81707317073 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4100617791 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414634146341 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8165022819 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21525293875 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115201200972 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990152258441 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146107592281 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783059351843 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.