The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000and 2005.
The given bar graph illustrates information about how many people visited three museums on a yearly basis, namely MET, New York, Edo-Tokyo and National, China, over a five-year period from 2000 to 2005. The number of visitors are given in millions.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were considerable upward trends in the guests of both MET of New York and National museum of China, while the number of people who visited Edo-Tokyo Museum saw a substantial fall over the period in question. Another interesting point is that people visited Edo-Tokyo more in 2000, but in 2005, National Museum of China became the most popular.
Looking at the details, as regards National museum of China, at around 6 million of people visited it in 2000, and there was a dramatic rise to approximately 11 millions. Having remained stable until 2004, it then rocketed to just under 16 millions. If we look at the trend of MET in New York, it started at 12 millions. Then there was a sharp decrease to 6 million of visitors in 2001, at which point it levelled off until 2002. Finally, it jumped, reaching at 14 millions in 2005.
By contrast, the rate of Edo-Tokyo went in the opposite site, which began at just over 13 millions. Having stained constant until 2001, it then declined significantly to about 6 millions. Finally, it grew gradually, achieving at 10 million of visitors in 2005.
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a car 84
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000and 2005 73
- The graph below shows predictions about the number of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 67
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996 84
- Some people think that cities are the best place to live Others prefer to live in a rural area Compare advantages and disadvantages of living in a city and countryside 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, then, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79668049793 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59303898416 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539419087137 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9225162844 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157760430904 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669191264807 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062156081302 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110073066768 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608241050556 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.