The graph below shows the percentage of people in the different age groups who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustration depicts information regarding the proportion of people in various age groups who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain between 1984 and 2000. Overall, it is relatively apparent that there was an upward trend in the figure for every age group. Additionally, people aged between 15-24 enjoyed watching at the cinema most frequently, while the proportion of cinema-goers aged at least 35 years old occupied the lowest data throughout the period.
Regarding the 15-24 age group, the proportion of audiences was 17% in 1984. After experiencing significant growth, it reached its pinnacle at the end of the interval, culminating at approximately 58%.
Concerning 7-14-year-old goers, the figure for this group started at 10% in 1984. Subsequently, it witnessed a gradual increase to reach 37% in 1999 before making a marginal decline in 2000.
In terms of people between 25 and 35 years old, 4% was recorded for the percentage of cinema audiences in 1984, after which it underwent erratic behaviors, documenting around 24% in 1994. Finally, it virtually maintained at the rate of 24% till 1999 before making a slight recovery in 2000.
Given people aged at least 35 years old, the figure for this group saw insignificant movements, becoming the age group possessing the proportion of people who went to the cinema once a month most negligible.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy 70
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18834080717 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94144426284 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7698649778 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.7 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223355285451 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965856766082 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103114755693 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129345628602 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962899399499 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18834080717 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94144426284 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7698649778 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.7 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223355285451 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965856766082 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103114755693 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129345628602 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962899399499 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.