The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons there relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons there relevant.

The line graph gives information about the changes in household access to CD players, mobile phones, home computers and the internet in the UK between 1996 and 2003.

Overall, the usage of all the modern technology increased steadily over the period given. CD players were the most accessible, while the internet was the least from 1996 to 2003.

In 1996, the usage of CD players was just under 60%. which had the highest accessibility, and rose steadily to over 80% in 2003. The internet was recorded firstly in 1998, with a start of around 10%, climbing to over 40% in 2003.

There was a relatively stable increase in the usage of home computers between 1996 and 2003, from around 30% to around 55%. In terms of mobile phones, there was a dramatic rise over the period given, and its accessibility surpassed that of home computers after 1999, taking up the second place of the four modern technology afterwards.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-13 mary.ssherr 56 view
2019-07-01 mary.ssherr 78 view
2019-01-22 mary.ssherr 56 view
2021-03-28 justinabu 78 view
2018-07-30 mary.ssherr 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...usage of CD players was just under 60%. which had the highest accessibility, and rose...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8417721519 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50863753813 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.660655308 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113741015303 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497140435545 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630652401822 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816930302357 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648430413866 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.