The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
As we can see, the line graph above describes population count and predication for India and China from 2000 to 2050, total population measured in billions.
In general, we can observe that Population in China slightly decrease, while in India Population is increasing dramatically throughout the period. Also, we can see both countries count meet at the same record in 2030.
In 2000, Total Population in India began by 1,000 billion, while the count in China was around 1,300 billion. Over the following two decades Chinese population grow up gently above 1,400 billion whereas population in India increasing dramatically around 1,400.
In 2030, it is predicated that Indian population take over Chinese and both population will be equal figures more than 1,400 billion. Then Population in India will surge to 1,600 billion by 2050. Meanwhile, Chinese population will steep fall after 2030 and will steadily drop for the rest of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Nguyen Bao Han | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25657894737 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63683685261 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9374424493 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334117483492 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164713842825 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871863592633 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221878253225 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676856225047 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.