The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
The presented line graph demonstrates the number of people in two different countries, namely India and China over the period of half century, starting from 2000 to 2050. Units are measured in billions for each one year.
The most striking feature to be observed is that, whilst China accounted for the highest number of people at the beginning of period, scientists forecast population rate of India will outnumber that of China towards the end of the survey.
Looking at the data in more detail, it is clear that in 2000, there were more people living in China than in India. The number of Chinese was about 1.25 billion, while the latter was 1 billion. Between 2000 and present, there has been a 0.32 billion rise in the number of Indian citizens. Over the same period, population of China has increased by 0.18 to reach the point of approximately 1.43 billion.
Turning to rest of description, it is expected that population growth in India will increase more quickly than in China. Experts are estimated that by 2030, both countries’ figures will be the same amount of 1.45 billion. After this, China’s population is likely to fall steadily the number of 1.4 billion, while India’s population will increase and reach 1.6 billion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Nguyen Bao Han | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 73
- The chart below gives information about Someland s main exports in 2005 2015 and future projections for 2025 71
- The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen European countries. 78
- The chart below show the percentage of water use by different sectors in sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0380952381 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63691309254 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4461098599 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258470870382 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103637335337 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603651134556 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161417574084 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319730337105 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.