the graph below shows the populations in India and China since the year of 2000and predicts populations growth until 2050.
The graph shows how the populations of India and China have changed since 2000 and how they will change in the future. Overall, there is a steady climb in the Indian population during the period. Whereas The Chinese population also rises regularly for some time but it is forecasted to decline in the future.
In 2000, there more people were living in China than in India. The number of Chinese was 1.25 billion, while India's population was about 1 billion. Between 2000 and 2010, there has been a 0.2 billion rise in the number of Indian citizens. Over the same period, China's population has increased by 0.1 billion to reach over 1.35 billion.
According to the graph, the population in India will increase more quickly than in China, and experts say that by 2030, both countries will have the same population of 1.45 billion. After this, China's population is likely to fall slightly to 1.4 billion in 2050, while India's population will probably increase and reach 1.6 billion.
Thus, over the 50 years, India is going to experience steady growth in its population and it will overtake China. On the other hand, China's population will peak in 2030 and then begin to fall.
- Companies should encourage employees who work in a high position to leave at the age of 55 in order to give opportunities to the new generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- the graph below shows the populations in India and China since the year of 2000and predicts populations growth until 2050 73
- The Bar Chart below shows the percentage of Australia men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- Some people think that genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 56
- Companies should encourage employees who work in a high position to leave at the age of 55 in order to give opportunities to the new generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79802955665 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33849581839 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3667325787 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33965592702 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142122344844 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751674916507 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225570893763 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539041550884 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.