The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particulur nation.
The line graph reveals the information about the percentage of paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics that recycled between 1982 to 2010 in a nation. As an overview, paper and cardboard was the highest recycled material.
It is clear from the chart that, the recycling of paper and cardboard started in 1982 with almost 62% which was further observed some fluctuations in the next years and it reached to highest point with 80% in 1994. While, this percentage was decrease by 10% in the latter year. However, half of the glass containers recycled in the former year, after dipping to a low of 40% in 1990, the glass recycling rate gradually increased to 60% in 2010.
Moving towards the other materials, aluminium cans were first recycled in 1986 starting at about 5%, but this figure climbed rapidly over 25 years and by 2010 it had reached 45%. Furthermore, recycling of plastics was not introduced until 1990, although the growth in this category was constant it was very slow, rising from about 2% to around 8% over the period.
To sum up, the percentage of paper and cardboard that recycled was the highest of four classes of material, but this category experienced a decline after 1994. Whereas, there was continuing upward trends in the other materials.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-06 | Komalsandhu | 90 | view |
- Some people think that tgere are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Others believe that action by individuals is useless and irrevelent and that us only governments and large business which can make a differencem 56
- The two pie charts below shows the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particulur nation. 90
- Some people prefer hobbies that require technology while some people think that hobbies do notvrequire technology. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- In order to improve a country's education system , high school students should be encouraged to openly critique or even criticise their teacher online. Do you agree or disagree with this? What do you think could be better options for impriving the co 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e chart that, the recycling of paper and cardboard started in 1982 with almost 62...
^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...ations in the next years and it reached to highest point with 80% in 1994. While, this pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ched to highest point with 80% in 1994. While, this percentage was decrease by 10% i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o highest point with 80% in 1994. While, this percentage was decrease by 10% in t...
^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rthermore, recycling of plastics was not introduced until 1990, although the grow...
^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...egory experienced a decline after 1994. Whereas, there was continuing upward trends in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, so, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95412844037 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58593568723 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3910898927 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167268144866 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700324549724 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535014626318 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107667140202 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403683656482 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.