The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
<span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;
font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;background:#0084FF;
mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA">The
line graph illustrates the percentage of four different materials that were
recycled in a particular country between 1982 and 2010. Overall, during 1982 to
2010 period, total line tend to rise compare with the first time. Paper and
cardboard took up highest, and then it gradually downed in the final time.
However, this trend being highest compare with total, whereas plastics started
lowest, afterward increased but insignificant. At begin with, we can see the
rate of paper and cardboard tend to up about 70% and then down back 60% until
1994 regain to increase 80%, finally, it a significant decreased (70%) but
being the highest ranking in 2010 . With glass containers began about 50% and
sharply declined (40%) in 1990, then back to first position in 1994, between
1994 and 2010 there is a gradually growth about 10%. Addition, aluminium
started about 3%- 4% in 1986, after that there is a dramatically jump about 40%
in the end time. Finally, plastics took up about 1% in 1990 , and then it rose
significant in 1994. It leveled off untill 2002, and growth nearly 10% in 2002,
reached the lowest on </span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | Bao Linh Le | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Bao Linh Le | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | wehbe | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-27 | Paramdeepsingh | 61 | view |
| 2018-09-23 | Rajan khehra | 87 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 11
- the graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 92
- Some people believes that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes, entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is importa 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparsions where revelant. 56
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sans-serif
...ht:107%; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;backgro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recycled
...of four different materials that were recycled in a particular country between 1982 an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cardboard
...ompare with the first time. Paper and cardboard took up highest, and then it gradually ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 21, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'being the highest'.
Suggestion: being the highest
...n the final time. However, this trend being highest compare with total, whereas plastics st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lowest
... with total, whereas plastics started lowest, afterward increased but insignificant....
^^^^^^
Line 23, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Being
...y, it a significant decreased 70% but being the highest ranking in 2010 . With glas...
^^^^^
Line 23, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... but being the highest ranking in 2010 . With glass containers began about 50% a...
^^
Line 27, column 24, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
... 1994, between 1994 and 2010 there is a gradually growth about 10%. Addition, aluminium starte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 51, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('jump') instead of another adjective.
...out 3%- 4% in 1986, after that there is a dramatically jump about 40% in the end time. Finally, p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 31, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...here is a dramatically jump about 40% in the end time. Finally, plastics took up...
^^
Line 31, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nally, plastics took up about 1% in 1990 , and then it rose significant in 1994....
^^
Line 33, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Significant
...p about 1% in 1990 , and then it rose significant in 1994. It leveled off untill 2002, an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.18041237113 4.92477711251 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 9.19571772565 2.65546596893 346% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.5556252614 43.030603864 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.222222222 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 3.83414634146 469% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0792460527076 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0235067552514 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363865499673 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0295838146457 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667682527256 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.56 11.4140731707 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.