The given line graph illustrates the trend for recycling of four different packaging material over a 28 year period between 1982 and 2010.
In general, the activity of making waste reusable, regardless of the material, is seen to become more popular during the period of the study. Paper and cardboard were the most recycled in 1982 and still remain so 3 decades later, whereas plastic remains the least to be reprocessed.
Looking at paper & cardboard and glass containers, it can be seen that both saw some fluctuations over the years, settling at a rate slightly higher than what they started with, 65% and 50% respectively. The former, after a minor drop, reached its peak at 80% (1994). After which, it steadily dropped to 70%. Meanwhile, the latter underwent a 10% drop by 1990 before recovering in 1994 and gradually growing thereafter.
Aluminum and Plastics, did not observe a single drop over the course of the study, once introduced in 1986 and 1980, respectively. Metal recycling saw a significant expansion of about 40% in total from 3%, a starting figure that matches plastics’ which was unable to gain even 10% in favour.
- he charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 90
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 78
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from school To what extent do you agree with this statement and why 73
- The chart below gives information about trends in internet use by females in the USA in two years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ached its peak at 80% 1994. After which, it steadily dropped to 70%. Meanwhile, t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, still, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99476439791 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71791174817 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.712041884817 0.547539520022 130% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.553301457 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109460937965 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398104085311 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639126567359 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798029977305 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773084809693 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.