The given line graph illustrates the trend for recycling of four different packaging material over a 28 year period between 1982 and 2010.
In general, the activity of making waste reusable, regardless of the material, is seen to become more popular during the period of the study. Paper and cardboard were the most recycled in 1982 and still remain so 3 decades later, whereas plastic remains the least to be reprocessed.
Looking at paper & cardboard and glass containers, it can be seen that both saw some fluctuations over the years, settling at a rate slightly higher than what they started with, 65% and 50% respectively. The former, after a minor drop, reached its peak at 80% (1994). After which, it steadily dropped to 70%. Meanwhile, the latter underwent a 10% drop by 1990 before recovering in 1994 and gradually growing thereafter.
Aluminum and Plastics, did not observe a single drop over the course of the study, once introduced in 1986 and 1980, respectively. Metal recycling saw a significant expansion of about 40% in total from 3%, a starting figure that matches plastics’ which was unable to gain even 10% in favour.
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 74
- The chart below gives information about trends in internet use by females in the USA in two years
- Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed However others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments Can experimentation on animals be justified Are there any alternatives 84
- Many people believe that zoos have no purpose in today s world and should be closed What problems do zoos bring What are the alternatives to zoos if they are closed 92
- Many people go through life doing work that they hate or have no talent for Why does this happen What are the consequences of this situation 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ached its peak at 80% 1994. After which, it steadily dropped to 70%. Meanwhile, t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, still, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99476439791 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71791174817 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.712041884817 0.547539520022 130% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.553301457 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109460937965 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398104085311 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639126567359 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798029977305 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773084809693 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.