The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day.
The two maps compare a university campus for what it used to be in 2010 and now, with changes that were done for the betterment.
Overall, the campus can be seen to have modernised and more student focused with the removal of older structures and addition of high rise buildings, especially for students. The same applies with the green environment which seems to have taken a turn for the worse in lieu of the new-era theme.
Looking at constructions at the campus, student accommodation has multiplied since 2010, whereas only one high rise and a smaller building existed before. Now, two more builds have erected west and east of the lake. Prior to that, a shop existed on the east side, which has been clubbed with other student amenities, in a centralised building south of the lake. An interesting development is the introduction of the science building in north west of the lake, and exterior renovation of the Art block to match the current theme.
However, the greenery of the place seems to have diminished, replaced with distributed trees around the area as well as a road leading up to the new student house for accessibility.
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summqrise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- he charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 67
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 78
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73473195222 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5205421647 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130932397664 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562709137597 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425550972289 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821004763135 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447697376715 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.