The given bar chart illustrates the percentage of environmentally-friendly energy of the total supply over a 7-year period starting from 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that in both 3 examined years while Norway was the leading country regarding consuming renewable resources, the opposite was true for Australia.
According to the chart, increasing trends were recorded in the proportion of reused energy in both Norway and Germany. In 2000, nearly three-fifths of the total energy consumption in Norway stemmed from green one, which was 6 times that of Germany. These figures gradually rose at 65% for the former and 15% for the latter after 4 years. At the end of the period, the percentages of green resources utilized reached a peak of nearly 80% and 18%, respectively.
In terms of Iceland and Australia, the consumption of environmentally-friendly sources of Australia fluctuated around 10% during a period of 7 years, which were also the lowest figure recorded among 4 nations. Having the same pattern, Iceland experienced growth from 50% to 58% in the first term before a slight decrease to 55% at the end of the period.
- Some people think personal happiness is directly related to economic success while others believe this depends on other factors Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- The chart below gives information about oil production capacity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the bar chart shows the percentage of elderly citizens in three countries in 1980 2000 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and incl 84
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08602150538 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32104916509 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618279569892 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9622952699 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121746091563 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548152875029 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665481636708 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079446927157 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693393296196 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.