The graph below shows the proprotion of our differnt materials that were recycled from 1982 t0 2010 in a particular country.
The given line graph illustrates recycling rate of plastics, paper ,aluminium cans and glass containers during 1982 to 2010.
It is clear that recycling parentage for aluminium cans experienced significant increase, However plastics graph remained fairly stable with negligible growth , furthermore other trends saw fluctuations over 28 year period.
In 1982, recycling rate for paper and glass containers were 65% and 50% respectively,while recycling aluminium cans started from 1986 and saw considerable growth after 24 years to over than 40% in 2010.However recycling plastics begun from 1990 and rose at negligible trend for the next years at approximately 9% . Moreover major materials in recycling industry followed different patterns after remarkable decline in 1990, level of recycling for paper fell slightly to 70%,in other hand numbers of glass containers rose considerably to 60% in 2010
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | Ayoobatash | 56 | view |
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now , and plans for it's development. 78
- The diagram below shows how a solar powered water pump works. 61
- Te graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across faculties of a major university in 2012
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not thaught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by theTourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...trates recycling rate of plastics, paper ,aluminium cans and glass containers duri...
^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ned fairly stable with negligible growth , furthermore other trends saw fluctuatio...
^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s saw fluctuations over 28 year period. In 1982, recycling rate for paper and gl...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...containers were 65% and 50% respectively,while recycling aluminium cans started from 1...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...after 24 years to over than 40% in 2010.However recycling plastics begun from 1990 and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...after 24 years to over than 40% in 2010.However recycling plastics begun from 1990 and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 313, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d for the next years at approximately 9% . Moreover major materials in recycling i...
^^
Line 9, column 316, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...or the next years at approximately 9% . Moreover major materials in recycling industry f...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82089552239 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11136297863 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.679104477612 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4184692796 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 195.0 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185762996762 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118946323152 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044346286669 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127226733431 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529591923388 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 13.2329268293 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.07 11.4140731707 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.0658536585 208% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.