The graph below shows the quantiies of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantiies of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

The diagram illustrates the total numbers of traded cargos with four types of transport methods in England from 1974 to 2002.
it can be clearly seen that traffic by road was the largest way to trade the cargos over 28 years. Overall, the amounts in these transportations were also increasing.
At the beginning, road was the biggest system already with 70 million tonnes. The next one was rail, which got 40 million tonnes, water was close to it by 2 million tonnes at 38 million tonnes as well as transcended it in 1978. As 2 million tonnes was transported via pipeline, which was the last one until 2002 while it rose gradually to 22 million tonnes finally.
In 1982, road transportation still stayed at 60 million tonnes consistently, water was raised to 55 million tonnes dramatically and rail fell steadily in 30 million tonnes. After 12 years, the numbers of cargos on rail was the lowest, which compared with other years, at 25 million tonnes, water was decreased lightly and road was up to 75 million tonnes softly. At the end, likewise, these ways reached the highest numbers of the cargos, with 100, 65, 40 for road, water and rail separately.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-28 cocococo123 78 view
Essays by user cocococo123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... methods in England from 1974 to 2002. it can be clearly seen that traffic by roa...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 for road, water and rail separately.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, likewise, so, still, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78109452736 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58727515409 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572139303483 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5890024633 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0749929217005 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485805248182 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655777820423 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795979359153 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696143368285 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.