The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The graph gives information about the tonnes of UK goods transported in 4 ways in 28 years.
It is an evident upward trend depicted in the graph, where the tonnes of goods transported by different modes increased from 1974 to 2002. Moreover, the most preferred way to transport goods was by road. Its data rose from 70 in 1974 to 100 tonnes in 2002, ranked first consistently for 28 years straight.
The quantity of pipeline shipments remained the lowest of all modes in 28 years. Compared with the pipeline's data in 1974, the ratio for water (approximately 40%) was higher by 35% and rose to 40% in 1978. Both modes experienced a boost in tonnes four years later; the goods transported by pipeline increased from 5 to 15 tonnes, whereas the waterway goods multiplied 20% more than the previous statistics of 40 tonnes. Moreover, the data for both modes remained unchanged for ten years until the waterway goods went downward in 1998 before rising again. Nevertheless, the tonnes of goods transported by pipeline surpassed 20 in 1994 and remained unchanged for nearly eight years.
The figures for goods delivered by road and rail, despite a slight difference between 1974 and 1978, were roughly the same during the next 24 years. The statistics for cargo returned to nearly 50 tonnes in 1978 while the data for rail goods dropped by half in the next four years. From 1986 to 2002, the cargo data rose to more than 80 tonnes and slightly dropped before reaching approximately 100 tonnes. The rail goods data experienced the same pattern before surpassing more than 40 tonnes in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | cookie12 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | taocute.s1 | 74 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Roy An | 11 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in wh 78
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pipelines'' or 'pipeline's'?
Suggestion: pipelines'; pipeline's
...ll modes in 28 years. Compared with the pipelines data in 1974, the ratio for water appro...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, nevertheless, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84926470588 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57581568614 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485294117647 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8192371705 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.461538462 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216571139338 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971291867026 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753228700509 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170128239191 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628076985006 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.