The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The graph gives information about the tonnes of UK goods transported in 4 ways in 28 years.
Overall, it is an upward trend depicted in the graph, where the tonnes of goods transported by different modes increased from 1974 to 2002. Moreover, the most preferred way to transport goods was by road. Its data rose from 70 in 1974 to 100 tonnes in 2002, ranked first consistently for 28 years straight.
The quantity of pipeline shipments remained the lowest of all modes in 28 years. Compared with the pipeline's data in 1974, the ratio for water (approximately 40%) was higher by 35% and rose to 40% in 1978. Four years later, the goods transported by pipeline increased from 5 to 15 tonnes, whereas the waterway goods multiplied 20% more than the previous statistics of 40 tonnes. Moreover, the data for both modes remained unchanged for ten years until the waterway goods went downward in 1998 before rising again. Nevertheless, the tonnes of goods transported by pipeline surpassed 20 in 1994 and remained unchanged for nearly eight years.
The figures for goods delivered by road and rail, despite a slight difference between 1974 and 1978, were roughly the same during the next 24 years. The data for cargo returned to nearly 50 tonnes in 1978 while the data for rail goods dropped by half in the next four years. From 1986 to 2002, the cargo data rose to more than 80 tonnes and slightly dropped before reaching approximately 100 tonnes. The ratio for railway goods experienced the same pattern before surpassing more than 40 tonnes in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | cookie12 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-10 | taocute.s1 | 74 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | Roy An | 11 | view |
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extent do you agree 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 84
- the best way to improve health is to exercise daily 56
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pipelines'' or 'pipeline's'?
Suggestion: pipelines'; pipeline's
...ll modes in 28 years. Compared with the pipelines data in 1974, the ratio for water appro...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, nevertheless, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54849787657 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496240601504 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.097674102 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5384615385 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213952256086 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958687943702 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752701422455 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168707944691 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639566277449 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.