The line graph illustrates the comparison of 4 different ways including road, water, rail and pipeline of good transport in UK during the period of 1974 to 2002. Overall, good transported by road, water and pipeline have an upward trend from 1974 to 2002 while goods transported by rail remained same about 40 million tonnes both in 1974 and in 2002.
It can be seen that the largest amount of goods was transported by road accounted for approximately 75 million tonnes in 1974 and slightly increased to 80 million tonnes in 1990 and reached the peak at almost 100 million tonnes in 2002. However, the number of goods quantities transported by water remained stable at about 40 from 1974 to 1978 which was the same point with rail transportation. In 1982, water transportation rose gradually to about 60 million tonnes in 1986 then reached over 60 million tonnes in 2002.This contrast to rail mode which saw a fluctuation over the following 15 years and reached at 41 in 2002.
However, the pipelines was used the least. It just transferred about 5 million tonnes in 1974, rose slightly and maintained the same level from 1995 to 2002 with 20 million tonnes.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
- The diagram below shows how geothemal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... reached over 60 million tonnes in 2002.This contrast to rail mode which saw a fluct...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.825 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69235491717 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5397491281 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282145263059 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14932282952 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106450979721 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199569998036 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127341222726 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.