Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective?

Nowadays, the world faces the pollution and traffic as serious problems. Some people believe that increasing fuel price is the best option to solve these problems. From my perspective, I partly agree with this idea and therefore will propose other solutions in this essay.

To begin with, a rise in petrol prices can reduce partially the air pollution and the traffic jam. If the fuel prices are too high, the driver who can not afford would choose other transportation as optional. People may stop using their private car and turn to use public transport such as bus, train or metro. As a result, fewer private vehicles would make the traffic less heavy, and also diminish the gas emission from transport which will improve the air quality.

In my opinion, the solution above will be effective in the countries whose public transport systems are efficient. For this reason, improve the choice of public transport service available to travelers will be the other solution. For example, if sufficient Sky train and metro system were built then traffic on our road would be decreased dramatically. Next, cleaner fuel should be promoted. Eco-friendly vehicle should be used widely and thus will help to refresh the air quality. in Japan or Singapore, resident stimulated to use biology power for their private car and lots of electrical car used, that is why these are the cleanest countries in the world. Netherlands is one of the countries used solar powered bike in transport as well.

In conclusion, there is no best measure to deal with traffic and pollution problems and we have to integrate different approaches for the successful results.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...s will help to refresh the air quality. in Japan or Singapore, resident stimulated...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05494505495 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5968190128 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1483040086 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147538002225 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546066292968 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460634543459 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101683044523 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427694324278 0.056905535591 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.