The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph represents the goods transportation patterns in the UK with regards to four different transport types over the period from 1974 and 2002.

The ammounts of merchandise transported by Road where the highest in 1974. By 2002, goods quantities have risen significantly and have reached approximately 100 million tonnes. iI comparison with road mode, rail transportation had frequent fluctuations. However, the amount of product have nearly the same and eventually were roughly twice as low as the quantities of goods transported traditionally

There has been a gradual increase in popularity of pipeline transportation from almost 5 to nearly 20 millions tonnes. Meanwhile, water transportation was experiencing unsteady rise in the quantities of goods. By the end of 28 years, product number transported by ships was 65 million times, which was triple as high as number transported by pipelines.

Overall, all four different kinds of transport had an eventual increase in use between 1974 and 2002.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
The given line graph represents the goods transportation patterns in the UK with ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: II
...ached approximately 100 million tonnes. iI comparison with road mode, rail transpo...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50632911392 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22807147403 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.1153838464 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355228642073 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158738150709 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732843699471 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22614199645 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645173545112 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.