The line graph illustrates the intake of fish and various species of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Decreasing from approximately 230 grams per person in 1979, Beef’s rate plunged to a low of 175 grams. This was followed by a dramatic rise reching a peak of 240 grams per head in 2004. Furthermore, it was reducing with sudden drops and indicator stopped at 110 grams per capito in 2004. The figures for the chicken at the beginning of the period, averages of chicken and lamb were nearly 140 and 150 grams. Respectively increased gradually throughout the period and achieved 250 grams per weak. By contrast, the consumption of lamb was declining steadily and finally ended the milestone up with 60 grams.
However, the most noticeable pattern was in the fish rate. Unlive other rinds of meat, it was significantly stable. Starting with 60 grams per inhabitant, it fell merely to 50 grams.
To sum up, people started eating chicken because of dissemination of fast food restaurants, such as KFC and Church’s chicken. That is why, the consumption of other kinds of meat decreased.
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 86
- friend has decided to switch careers but isn’t sure which to choose. What advice would you give them? Provide reasons and examples to support your response. 70
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2016, and future projections for 2025. 86
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e nearly 140 and 150 grams. Respectively increased gradually throughout the perio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, so, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96256684492 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85083418831 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631016042781 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1374002015 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.3333333333 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5833333333 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18237582 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739840466743 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118018958428 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155708973876 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156006098175 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.