The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph displays how many goods were transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different routes
Overall,the primary route of transport was by road, and the number of goods conveyed by all modes increased apart form pipeline which remained relatively stable
In 1974, about 70 million tonnes of goods were transported by road this number increased steadily to just under 100 million tonnes in 2002,transport by pipeline followed a similar trend of steady increase with about less than 5 million tonnes being transported by pipeline in 1974 to about 20 million tonnes in 2002.
The numbers for both water and rail transport were similar in 1974 with about 40 million tones , the figures for rail transport witnessed some fluctuations but remained relatively stable, while those of water had a steady rise to above 60 in 2002
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...d 2002 by four different routes Overall,the primary route of transport was by road,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: APART_FORM[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: apart from
...f goods conveyed by all modes increased apart form pipeline which remained relatively stab...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...974 to about 20 million tonnes in 2002. The numbers for both water and rail tran...
^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ilar in 1974 with about 40 million tones , the figures for rail transport witnesse...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 711.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07857142857 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62225350989 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 8.94146341463 22% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 70.0 22.4926829268 311% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 173.0 43.030603864 402% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 355.5 112.824112599 315% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 70.0 22.9334400587 305% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340586897803 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243915379397 0.103423049105 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107517135328 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23445876192 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149297799612 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 37.5 13.2329268293 283% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 8.89 61.2550243902 15% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 29.4 10.3012195122 285% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.37 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 11.4329268293 455% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 30.0 10.9970731707 273% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 30.0 11.0658536585 271% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.