The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph compares the products in the United Kingdom in terms of their ways of transport during the period from 1974 to 2002.
Road transport was the most important transportation throughout the period: despite fluctuations from time to time, the amount of goods transported by car showed an overall upward trend and rose to nearly 100 million tonnes in 2002.
Waterway transportation was as important as railway before 1978, when a noticeable increase was seen in waterway and the railway experienced a decline, widening the gap between the two modes. From 1980 to 1998, the quantities of goods carried by boats underwent some ups and downs, before roaring to around 65 million tonnes, a 25 million increase from 1974. In terms of railway, the pattern was more volatile, reaching the lowest point at 30 in 1994 and then climbing back to around 40 million in 2002.
The figures for pipeline showed a much clearer increasing trend, growing from less than 10 million in 1974 to more than 10 million in 1994 and remained unchanged thereafter, although the speed of increase was higher during the 1978-1982 and 1990-1994 periods.
Overall, all the four transportation modes transported more goods in 2002 than in 1974, despite some fluctuations, and roadway transportation has always been the most important way in the UK.
- A longer prison term as a way of punishing those who break the law is not as good as other methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine.A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 52
- Volunteer work organised by middle schools brings more benefits than problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- The graph show the saving of individual in different countries for the year 1970, 1990 and 2000.pie chart 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15525114155 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78349362925 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570776255708 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5330603706 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.285714286 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.14285714286 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322475033312 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152323655666 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124975100786 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197334477166 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122966703915 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.