the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph compares four different modes of transport in terms of the quantities of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
It is clear that the quantities of goods transported by road were by far highest, while the figure for pipeline was by far lowest during the research period.
In 1974, the levels of goods transported in the UK were biggest, at slightly more than 70 million tonnes, while the figures for water and rail were the same, at roughly 40 million tonnes. Meanwhile, there were nearly around 5 million tonnes of goods transported by pipeline.
In 2002, goods transported by road saw a dramatic increase of 30 million tonnes to approximately 100 million tonnes and became the highest figure in the line chart. There were significant rises to around 65 and 22 million tonnes in the quantities of good transported by water and pipeline respectively, whereas rail’s figure remained stable, at about 40 million tonnes from 1974 to 2002.
- Owning a gun 73
- There have been many inventions in human history, such as the wheel. Some people think the most important thing is the internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- Often, the most successful people--in business, athletics, entertainment, or any field--are those who have focused all of their attention on achieving a specific goal. Those who spread their energy in many directions may not be as successful. In your opin 70
- The bar chart compares the rates of students in different nations in terms of learning a foreign language in year 2000. 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some to tourist facilities. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 5 million tonnes of goods transported by pipeline. In 2002, goods transported...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94478527607 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73270017915 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515337423313 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2922882535 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345972920963 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223001533532 0.103423049105 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193043711215 0.0843802449381 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279331337406 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.216636321491 0.0819641961636 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.