The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.
The given diagram indicates the rate of smoking per 1000 citizens in Someland over the period of 1960 and 2000, a period of 40 years.
In general, the number of men smoking was always higher than the number of women who smoked in the timescale of 40 years. Moreover, the rates of male smokers show a gradual downward trend, whereas the rate of female smokers climbed higher in this period
In 1960, the rate of male smokers is 600. This was far higher than the rates of female smokers, which were just under 100. However, it then declined gradually throughout 1960 and 2000 and finished at around 250.
In contrast, apart from a steadiness at just under 200 between 1965 and 1970, the number of women who smoked grew significantly until it reached its peak at just above 300 in the period of 1975 and 1980. Then the rates of female smokers witnessed a gradual decrease, which finished at 200 in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | an-an | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | jenmin | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | Thu Phung | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-05 | hoaihoang2801 | 67 | view |
- foreign language 73
- The line graph below shows the changes in amount in type of fast food consumed bu Australian teenagers from 1975 to 200. 73
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 63
- The line graph below shows the changes in amount in type of fast food consumed bu Australian teenagers from 1975 to 200. 73
- Foreign language 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, apart from, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69135802469 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25557954402 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524691358025 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3118732837 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257849858503 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117017486037 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874868080798 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171331025321 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868271630462 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.