The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.
The given diagram indicates the rate of smoking per 1000 citizens in Someland between 1960 and 2000, a period of 40 years.
In general, despite the downward trend showed in the number of men smoking, these figures were always higher than the number of women who smoked in this period.
In 1960, the rates of male smokers were 600. This was far higher than the rates of female smokers, which were just under 100. However, it then declined gradually throughout 1960 and 2000 and finished at around 250.
In contrast, apart from a steadiness at just under 200 between 1965 and 1970, the number of women who smoked grew significantly until it reached a peak at just above 300 in the period of 1975 and 1980. Then the rates of female smokers witnessed a gradual decrease, which finished at 200 in 2000, a double rise compared to where it began.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | an-an | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | jenmin | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | Thu Phung | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-05 | hoaihoang2801 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 73
- foreign language 73
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 73
- Foreign language 73
- The line graph below shows the changes in amount in type of fast food consumed bu Australian teenagers from 1975 to 200. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, apart from, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 704.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69333333333 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25763888462 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0763669796 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24756598572 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118604052013 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101315827364 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162748010203 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115081656938 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.