The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph indicates the transition in prices for four different categories from 1978 to 2009 and the overall trend Consumer-price index throughout 30 years.
Overall, although the four groups were similar in terms of a general increase, the price shifts in the USA in most years was higher than the others.
All the lines on the graph have the same starting figure, approximately 60% in 1979. Over the next two years, there was a slight growth in the tendency of Sugar and sweets which peaked at 100 in 1981 while the price of Carbonated drinks remained stable. Although experienced the minor fluctuation, their number rose constantly below the figure of CPI. In 2000, the price of Sugar and sweets surged to almost 200 whereas the figure for Carbonated drinks around 150, which lower than the CPI was more than 200.
On the other hand, in spite of decreasing in 1983, the value of fresh fruits and vegetable provided an upward trend afterwards that peaked at 300 at the end of the period.
- The line graph compares three companies in terms of their waste output between the years 2000 and 2015. 61
- As well as making money, businessesalso have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree 61
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76878612717 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47036631826 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635838150289 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7052389238 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176947833478 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702192043354 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452628206446 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892999720676 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552359453051 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.