The line graph compares three companies in terms of their waste output between the years 2000 and 2015.

Essay topics:

The line graph compares three companies in terms of their waste output between the years 2000 and 2015.

The line graph gives information about how many tonnes of waste that three corporations throw in the environment from 2000 to 2015.
Generally, there is a downward tendency in the amounts of waste produced in company A and B, while the other enterprise surged.
In the year 2000, the amount of rubbish from company A (12 tonnes) was higher than the figure for business B that stood at just under 9 tonnes. Over the following five years, the tonnes of garbage of company B growth up and reached a peak of almost 11 tonnes before experiencing a dramatic drop and hit a low-point in 2015 (3 tonnes). Meanwhile, the data of firm A decreased steadily and accounted for 8 tonnes at the end of the period.
On the other hand, 3 tonnes was the starting point of corporation C. Over the next fifteen years, this figure raised rapidly resulted in exceeding the figure of other businesses- 10 tonnes in the year 2015.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-29 Adler 61 view
Essays by user Adler :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the amounts of waste produced in company A and B, while the other enterprise surg...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59259259259 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60578653324 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598765432099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1998925884 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18725925672 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847433114668 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832189541272 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125873420518 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082078186765 0.0819641961636 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.