'the graph below shows the spending of uk residents on visits abroad between 1993 and 2013"
The following line graph provides information about how much money England citizens invested on international trips over ten years, since 1993 from 2003.
Overall, the graph attests that the holiday overseas was a priority for UK citizens and it had a relevant growth since 1993. In contrast, in the same period, by the miscellaneous reasons, the England people wasted less with visits abroad than other verified categories over the research years.
The graphs reinforce the trends that the UK residents since 1993 invest the majority part of your resources on Holyday overseas. In 1993 these costs represented money apport by almost 9 billion, triple of "business" that had 3 billion and near 18 times better than "visits friends and relatives" which represented only 500 million, all in the same year.
Furthermore, England citizens were wasting the same average of resources on the miscellaneous reasons to abroad. This class had a small oscillation over the following ten years, even operate with values less than 700 million. The other two categories, "business, and "visit friends and relatives" showed a small increase and finished these historical series in equal conditions, both with results near 5 billion in 2003
- The graph below shows the reasons for the use of social media by business by size of business in 2012 40
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education 89
- the graph below shows the spending of uk residents on visits abroad between 1993 and 2013 79
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph below shows the reasons for the use of social media by business by size of business in 2012 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s over ten years, since 1993 from 2003. Overall, the graph attests that the holi...
^^^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e 1993. In contrast, in the same period, by the miscellaneous reasons, the Englan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47692307692 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12654853152 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1462899915 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171332640594 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785554298232 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559600873527 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105704420081 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393344215655 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.