The graphs below show the growth in wages within the G7 Nations between 2000-2007 and 2008-2012.
Both figures below reveal the payrolls of how a special and rich group of countries during two periods, 2000 to 2007, and 2008 to 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that the UK started the series with hight growth over 5% followed by the US with rates near 3,5 in and Canada with 3% in the first period. European nations showed started with a minor rate but stayed more stable during all periods, except Italy. Japan oscillated your wages rates all time that was analyzed.
Canada, the US, and the UK demonstrated a constant and strong trend to grow in the first period. But, later just Canada keeping this positive tendency. The UK plunge your rates through for years and achieved negative rates as -2% in 2011. The US in the same period registered two negatives years and a small growth from 2009 to 2011.
The European G7 nation's measures had majority increased, except Italy. France and Germany have a great performance during all time they registered only three years with a negative rate, France in 2008 with -02% and Germany with imperceptive decreases near 0,1% in 2004 and 2005. The Italians numbers described a distinct situation, this context represents several oscillations over the years with positive picks with 2% in 2004 and droops like 2011 with -2%.
Japan, only Asia nation in the G7, exhibited similar behavior of Italians, inconstant rates, in some moments rocket up as in 2011 with +3% and other moments plunge as 2001 with -2%.
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education 89
- the graph below shows the spending of uk residents on visits abroad between 1993 and 2013 79
- The graph below shows the reasons for the use of social media by business by size of business in 2012 95
- Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries How far do you agree with this statement Use your own examples to support 60
- Young people are often the first to suffer when job opportunities are scarce In which ways does age affect employment opportunities How might employees deal with the issues fairly 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and a small growth from 2009 to 2011. The European G7 nations measures had majori...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.804 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35117332411 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.744555816 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.083333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125836879183 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489658955263 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568649041467 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809123065776 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645887721033 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.