Essay topics:
The graph below shows total internet users in Vietnan from 2003 to the second quarter 2012.
The given bar graph depicts, most of Internet users were in 2012 year and the lowest users were in 2003. On the other hand , year by year Internet users were gradually gone up to 2012. And from 2011-2012 users were shown approximately same million. In 2012 year users were higher than others. And between 2008-2009 years were represented roughly significant same quantity . In 2010 year users were presented over a quarter. Overall, most of Internet users were in 2012 from Vietnan. And step by step or year by year was respectively rised in 2012.
Votes
Essay Categories
Essays by user geethisha
:
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spared from 1981- 2007 73
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the una titles of goods transported in the uk between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spread from 191. - 2007 73
- The chart below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the parkway hotel how the rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...st users were in 2003. On the other hand , year by year Internet users were gradua...
^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sented roughly significant same quantity . In 2010 year users were presented over ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 452.0 965.302439024 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 94.0 196.424390244 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8085106383 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.11373725848 3.73543355544 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47030980963 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 55.0 106.607317073 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 130.5 283.868780488 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.3234822018 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.5 112.824112599 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.75 22.9334400587 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263672530018 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151587588475 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10470213367 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263672530018 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.23 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.43 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.