The line graph compares the percentage of Twitter users in 4 different age groups in the USA between November 2010 and May 2013.
Overall, every group saw a rise in the use of app over the period, while 18 to 29 year-olds used the app at the highest rate throughout the graph period.
The youngest group started the period at just below 15%, the highest percentage at that time, and witnessed a gradual rise to just below 20% over a month. However, the percentage remained more or less the same till August 2011, after which there was a rapid jump in the interest of Twitter to nearly a third in August 2012. Then, the popularity of the app dropped to three-tenths over the next nine months.
In terms of the other three groups, the average percentage of Twitter users decreased with the age. Hence, over 65 years, who stood at just below 5% in the beginning and finished the period at one-fifth, used the app at the lowest rate. 30 to 40-year-old people and 50-64 aged people saw a similar pattern, with just above 5% in November 2010 and at approximately 17% and 12.5% at the end of the period, respectively.
- People find it very difficult to speak in public or to give a presentation before an audience Do you think public speaking skill is really important Give reasons 78
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problem m 73
- Line graph number of visitors per month in summer 2013 In thousands 86
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2010 84
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2018 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, then, third, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57213930348 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47396282653 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.432467291 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277086624589 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129815774275 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167192187306 0.0843802449381 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220699607605 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197898568003 0.0819641961636 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.