The graph below shows the types of transport used by tourists who visited New Zealand from five countries in 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the comparison between the proportions of four different vehicles utilized by tourists who visited New Zealand from Britain, Germany, Japan, Korea, and Australia in 2004; namely, airplane, coach, car, and ferry. Overall, the data shows that the Japanese prefer to travel by air the most, while other countries have the highest percentage of car travelers.
Looking at the graph, it can be seen that 60% of British, approximately 50% of German, 50% of Korean, and 45% of Australian tourists visited various places in New Zealand by car. The Japanese, on the other hand, was not fond of driving; only 25% of them used this mode of transportation. However, Japanese visitors were most interested in air travel. 55% of them opted for an airplane to immigrate to New Zealand, followed by British, Korean, and German visitors, in turn of 45%, 30%, and 25%, respectively. Australian tourists used air travel as their least preferred vehicle to discover New Zealand, at around 11%.
Fairly similar to air travel categories, the Japanese preferred coaches as the second-rate vehicle to visit New Zealand, at 52%, which is the highest proportion in this article. 40% of Korean travelers used coaches, twice as much as the figure for British tourists, which is equal to the corresponding percentage for Germany, at 20%. The figure for Australian travelers was ranked last, at only 8%. Finally, nearly 48% of German tourists and 35% of British tourists were fond of ferries, whereas the proportion of tourists from Japan, Korea, and Australia who used ferries as a means of transport was less than 15% in each case, at roughly 10%, 8%, and 15%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, second, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 275.0 196.424390244 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05454545455 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72551701063 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567272727273 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9412935937 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.363636364 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188597852984 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697329946176 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563246596203 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139871471354 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281550634349 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.